Учебная работа № 02519. «Реферат Понятие профессии «экономист» и «бухгалтер», принципиальные отличия
Содержание:
«Введение 3
1. Понятие профессии – экономист, эффективный сотрудник 4
2. Профессия – бухгалтер, сущность и функции 11
3. Различия между бухгалтером и экономистом 16
Заключение 18
Список использованной литературы 20
1. Бакаев А.С. Корреспонденция счетов бухгалтерского учета. – М.: ИПБ-Бинфа, 2013. – 472 с.
2. Богатая И.Н., Лабынцев Н.Т., Хахонова Н.Н. Аудит. Учебное пособие. – Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 2014. – 475 с.
3. Бухгалтерская (финансовая) отчетность: Учебное пособие / Под ред. проф. В.Д. Новодворского. – М.: Инфра-М, 2012. – 464 с.
4. Бухгалтерский учет: Учебник / Под ред. П. С. Безруких. – М.: Бухгалтерский учет, 2013. – 436 с.
5. Глушков И.Е. Бухгалтерский учёт на современном предприятии. — Новосибирск: Кнорис, 2013. – 830 с.
6. Донцова Л.В., Никифорова Н.А. Профессия — Экономист. — М.: Дело и Сервис. – 2013. – 368 с.
7. Камышанов П.И., Бухгалтерский учет и аудит. – М.: Омега-Л, 2012. – 560 с.
8. Кондраков Н.П. Бухгалтерский учет. – М.: Инфра-М, 2014. – 672 с.
9. Ламыкин И. А. Бухгалтерский учет. Учебник. — М.: Филинъ, 2013. –520 с.
10. Макарова Н.М. Квартальный и годовой отчет: новые формы отчетности. – М.: Информцентр XXI века, 2012. – 320 с.
»
Форма заказа готовой работы
Выдержка из похожей работы
Your time is 45 minutes
Accordingly, judicial activity is essentially the last link in the chain of
the crystallisation of the rule of law ..,it is the bridge between the
necessarily abstract legal rule and the necessarily individual nature of
the particular case,Every case is individual and every rule abstract,This doctrine obliterates any distinction between law and obligation or,
more precisely, legal relationships,The latter constitute only the
specific application of the former,This assimilation of legal material has
a peculiar consequence for the presentation of international law: The actual content of international law is even more meagre than may
appear from its presentation in text-books, when we consider that most
rules of international law are concerned with a definition of subjective
rights established by particular or general treaty,Rights of this nature
would hardly appear in a presentation of a system of municipal law which is
composed of abstract rules of an objective nature,There is thus an apparent tension at the heart of Lauterpacht’s concept
of law,On the one hand, law lies in the legal relationships established by
the parties inter se, while yet equally on the other hand, law comprises
precepts which exist independently of the parties’ will,Further, Lauterpacht sees law as an imperative system, that is as a
series of commands directed at the subjects of the legal system to regulate
their behaviour,Given his adhesion to pacta sunt servanda as the
fundamental presupposition underpinning the system, once a state’s
agreement is given, whether tacitly or expressly, to a norm then the
resulting rule binds the state independently of its will,Regardless of
whether pacta sunt servanda is a customary norm or initial hypothesis, it
constitutes a command, i.e,a rule existing independently of the will of
the parties,It is of no consequence that in the international sphere the
command does not issue from a political superior,Law may be a command
without being the command of an organized political community ..»